电报群搜索工具www.tel8.vip)是一个Telegram群组分享平台,电报群搜索工具包括电报群搜索工具、telegram群组索引、Telegram群组导航、新加坡telegram群组、telegram中文群组、telegram群组(其他)、Telegram 美国 群组、telegram群组爬虫、电报群 科学上网、小飞机 怎么 加 群、tg群等内容。电报群搜索工具为广大电报用户提供各种电报群组/电报频道/电报机器人导航服务。

More to be done: Many multinationals only disclosed a tiny fraction of their overall emissions. Greenwashing has become blatant at some companies, according to an expert at the Rocky Mountain Institute.

COMPANIES have been calculating their carbon footprints since the early 2000s and just over one-in-three of the world’s 2,000 largest public corporations have now set goals to become carbon neutral or emissions-free by mid-century or sooner.

Even Saudi Aramco – the world’s biggest oil major – has pledged to achieve “operational net-zero” carbon emissions by 2050, just days before the United Nations climate summit last year.

But with such self-set deadlines still a long way off and varying definitions of what going “net-zero” actually means for a company, there is currently no global uniform standard for how businesses disclose their carbon emissions.

Indeed, many companies have been accused of “greenwashing” – or simply making public pledges that are not matched by their actual climate-related actions.

“Greenwashing is growing and it will continue to grow as long as there are no standards that clarify who does what exactly,” said Emmanuel Faber, head of the International Sustainability Standards Board, set up last year and tasked with drafting a universal climate reporting standard for companies.

According to the NGO Carbon Market Watch, a number of multinationals only disclosed a tiny fraction of their overall emissions.

It said that Saudi Aramco resorted to the widely used trick of promising to reach net-zero only for its “operational” carbon emissions.

,

欧博手机版下载www.aLLbet8.vip)是欧博集团的官方网站。欧博官网开放Allbet注册、Allbe代理、Allbet电脑客户端、Allbet手机版下载等业务。

,

That essentially means greenhouse gas emissions that are produced directly by the industrial sites it owns, but not the vast majority of “indirect” CO2 emissions produced by burning the oil it sells to clients, in their cars, power plants and furnaces.

Aramco told AFP it was reporting its emissions “in line with the GHG Protocol” and was investing in low carbon technologies for its clients.

The GHG protocol – drawn up by a US-based NGO and a group of major companies – is a way for companies to measure the greenhouse gas emissions of their factories, offices, suppliers, employees and clients.

But it is not all-encompassing and companies are not obliged to use it, making it difficult to accurately compare their overall carbon footprints.

For Thomas Koch Blank, an expert at the Rocky Mountain Institute, greenwashing has become “blatant” at some companies.

But even for well-intentioned firms, the absence of rules as strict as those used in financial accounting leaves ample room for arbitrary interpretation.

It was not until 2021 that efforts to harmonise standards really began to accelerate, said Peter Paul van de Wijs, from the Global Reporting Initiative, an Amsterdam-based body that has been developing environmental and social standards since 2000.

青岛新闻网生活在线声明:该文看法仅代表作者自己,与青岛新闻网生活在线无关。转载请注明:电报群搜索工具(www.tel8.vip):Global effort to police ‘greenwashing’ emerges
发布评论

分享到:

俄乌局势进展:扎波罗热核电站停运 乌方称控制哈尔科夫多个重镇
1 条回复
  1. 蛊咒┖━
    蛊咒┖━
    (2022-09-12 00:48:26) 1#

    if you have a subscription总之加油吧

发表评论

◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。